Projekt Olefiny III zostaje anulowany. W tle widmo strat liczących się w miliardach.

„`html

Context and Developments: Orlen and Olefiny III

Orlen recently faced significant challenges regarding its investment in the expansion of Olefiny III Complex. According to reports, the decision to halt the project emerged from a thorough analysis of costs and project conditions, which revealed that the investment was unlikely to yield any return. This decision was deemed the most advantageous option to minimize further potential losses caused by prior management’s errors.

Critical Findings and Financial Implications

During the scrutiny of Olefiny III’s expansion project, it was uncovered that there were multiple discrepancies in planning and execution as per the prior management’s approach. Such issues spanned assumptions, alignments with market conditions, scheduling, and technological application. Moreover, significant technical and design-related challenges were identified, impacting the project’s execution.

The Olefiny III expansion initiative was initially introduced in 2018 under the presidency of Daniel Obajtek. The expansion of the Olefiny complex formed a part of Orlen’s broader petrochemical development strategy.

Unrealized Investment and Rising Costs

As the project costs escalated unexpectedly, analysts pointed out the growing unviability of the investment, with estimations now ranging from 45 to 51 billion zlotys. This vastly exceeds the initial projected amount of 8.3 billion zlotys, as well as subsequent projections of 25 billion zlotys by previous management. In November, analysts had already highlighted the sharp rise in expenses, which further fueled concerns about the project’s feasibility.

Expert Opinions and Analysis

Industry experts, like Kamil Kliszcz from BM mBank, highlighted that continuously rising costs and delays would not just halt the project’s profitability but might also deteriorate the group’s value. Similarly, Łukasz Prokopiuk from DM BOŚ emphasized that previous management made politically driven, counterproductive decisions negatively impacting the company’s worth. These choices included, notably, the Olefiny project, which was poised to unfavorably affect the company’s stock.

Conclusion: Strategic Reevaluation

The Olefiny III project, under progress for three years and involving over 12 billion zlotys already, was envisioned to replace existing capacities and enhance Orlen’s share in the European petrochemical market. Initially estimated to bolster the company’s EBITDA by around 1 billion zlotys annually, the project costs had been projected initially at 13.5 billion zlotys, making it one of the largest petrochemical investments in Europe over the past two decades.

  • The decision to cease the project’s current form was taken to avoid incurring substantial losses.
  • Financial implications were scrutinized, aligning with Orlen’s long-term strategic goals.

„`